So, blew some time on understanding gcc build internals, but it was worth it. Big ideas for improving musl-cross-make.
-
-
Replying to @RichFelker
In principle I've got a libc-agnostic way to do a single-stage toolchain build that could be used with glibc, uclibc too.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes
And it pokes at fewer gcc internals, and produces a staged toolchain that can be used in-place from the build tree.
10:38 PM - 14 Dec 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.