Great thread on personal opsec/safety.https://twitter.com/flexlibris/status/797086038111883264 …
I'm generally _very_ skeptical of language like "on both sides", "just as bad", etc. Usually it's false equivalences.
-
-
But in any cases jumping on a friend to "warn me about her" on the basis of her current twitter name was uncalled for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
e.g. when ppl opposed to particularly oppressive religious extremism (calling for death to apostates etc) are attacked as racist
-
or when people who oppose religious groups in the 'west' calling for death to all homosexuals, are then attacked as 'racists'.
-
religious freedom and tolerance is a wonderful ideal. regressive double-standards & apologism for human rights violation's not.
-
I'd rathr opportnty to hear out people lk this rather thn thought policing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0plC24YuoJk …, whether I fully agree or not
-
It's not anti-Muslim (or anti-Islam) to permit such discussion. Many/most Muslims in West even want discussn that some AFA don't
-
Of course we shouldn't also support neonazi hate. But I'm not sure violent vigilante mob judge/jury/exectnrs r any answer either
-
You're repeating a lot of talking points that come from people with serious misinformation on these issues...
-
...and I really don't want to be lectured on them or have my friends judged on the basis of such.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.