Quick reminder to ppl: it’s 0days or encryption, pick one. National security issues mean govs legitimately need to read some ppl’s data.https://twitter.com/martijn_grooten/status/781968616191250432 …
-
-
not related to what I said, but sure.

-
Not seeing how. Allowing LE/IC to use 0day (or any) exploits sounds like both unreasonable search & deprivation of property
-
that is not an opinion shared by judges or lawyers. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
Whose lawyers? I bet it's shared by the ACLU's, EFF's, etc. lawyers. :-)
-
yup. If you have a warrant it is not a violation of 4a. Not even ACLU believes that searching a computer w/a warrant violates 4a
-
With a warrant is different, but valid warrants must be specific. In practice they're not.
-
now you’re moving the goal posts. Your earlier position was that use of exploits for a search is an inherent 4a violation.
-
I'm sorry for being imprecise; this is Twitter. My position is that most real-world use of exploits is 4a and 5a violation...
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.