Tired: the C[++] standard should mandate than null dereferences not be optimized away. Wired: optionals.
-
-
Replying to @stephentyrone
Is moving across other accesses "optimized away"? If yes, you precluded all reordering w/o explicit null-check branches. :-)
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @RichFelker
I don't think
@stephentyrone is arguing in favor. I think “tired” refers to the debate about it.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Replying to @volatile_void @stephentyrone
Yeah that's what I figured. It's still a good question though, no?
8:04 AM - 20 Sep 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.