Rather every time I think the BSDs might be less-broken than mainstream Linux, I find something like this... :-(
I don't call expressing half-surprise/half-sad-laughter at OpenBSD's tolerance of UB "shitposting".
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do you think Alpine takes responsibility for fixing UB in BusyBox, that they package? That would be good, I have a bunch…
-
No, but BB's own build process works around it and if more was needed it would be a package-specific workaround.
-
What was surprising about OpenBSD here was the implication that their own code is full of UB, not 3rd party stuff they package.
-
they would not apply the adjective “legacy” to their own code :)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.