We should always keep in mind that a "valid" but "low-quality" impl. is free to only compile one fixed program.
The standard doesn't limit them, though. So printf("%999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999d",0)
-
-
My point here is that the standard is full of omissions of necessary explicit requirements or error conditions.
-
It's a willfully buggy/incomplete standard by a committee who thinks "you know what we meant!" suffices...
-
Interpreting that into something without gratuitous severe usability flaws is left to the reader. :-(
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.