@whatimeantosay why the hell would i care?
@jcase Because we're not using it to take away people's rights and privacy, just to make up for lack of rights under the law (copyright).
-
-
@RichFelker it could be argued that any license placing restrictions takes rights, its a silly argument but yeah -
@jcase An actual license doesn't/can't place restrictions; it can only lift them. What you call a "restriction" is just conditional lifting. -
@jcase But if a license required something abusive as a condition for lifting a restriction, it would be an abusive license. -
@RichFelker these location systems are turned on after the person defaults, and its used to collect another person's property -
@jcase Even if that were sufficient to make them non-abusive, where is the proof? They're not exactly open-source, already have GPS perms. -
@RichFelker find a copy and we can prove it one way or another
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@jcase If you don't understand, worst that happens is you don't realize some freedom you have. Not spyware recording your personal life. -
@jcase But re: abusive loan terms it would not help if they fully understood terms. Accepting under duress is not consent, is abusive. -
@RichFelker that argument could apply to almost any type of contract that you need
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.