@LeoUnglaub 100x slower than gcc at compiling (for small well-factored source files) due to startup overhead, and 2x output code size.
@LeoUnglaub And lots of serious codegen problems like massive stack usage due to lifting sp adjustment all the way after heavy inlining.
-
-
@LeoUnglaub At this point clang/llvm is still a toy for ideologues & corporate users allergic to GPL, not a viable contender vs GCC quality. -
@LeoUnglaub And in terms of clean internals with sound theoretical base, firm/cparser is "llvm/clang done right" (but without Apple $$$).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.