The @docker Alpine mistake - This article sums it up nicely. Was this decisioned really vetted? #Docker http://technosophos.com/2016/02/25/the-alpine-mistake.html …
-
-
Replying to @LachlanEvenson
@LachlanEvenson The author seems pretty ignorant about the technical aspects. Neither Alpine nor musl is made to be "cheap", rather better.2 replies 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@LachlanEvenson glibc was buggy mismanaged stagnant crap for decades and only recently started fixing longstanding problems...1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@LachlanEvenson ...largely based on bug reports issued or popularized by musl & solutions/designs pioneered in musl.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@LachlanEvenson When sw doesn't work out of the box on Alpine/musl, it's usually because it's doing something mildly to deeply wrong.1 reply 5 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker Never said that it didn't work. Was questioning how the decision was made to make it the base for all docker images1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@LachlanEvenson *nod* You didn't, but the article seems to mischaracterize musl as something more like what dietlibc was.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.