Uhg, OpenRISC needs their GCC port rewritten because copyright assignment is impossible or something...https://twitter.com/FossiFoundation/status/704409977058926592 …
@pitwuu @Kryptoblog It's a practical question because, if not, "go with clang" is a non-answer to lack of upstream or1k in gcc.
-
-
@RichFelker@Kryptoblog like always it's just GPL folks don't want to play nice with BSD projects, because they consider it proprietary code - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@RichFelker@pitwuu and of course having gcc for or1k is very important for viability of or1k and systems based on it.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RichFelker@pitwuu I know it was a bit snarky, sorry. But unless Linux is implicit, clang should be an alternative, correct?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.