@RichFelker isn’t that story true for any emerging architecture though?
-
-
Replying to @piecritic
@piecritic Yes. But it's a major obstacle to making the arch (or any new arch) practical and nobody seems to be taking it seriously.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker well yes, not _yet_ though. I think it hasn’t in the minds of many people crossed from “excellent engineering experiment” yet.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @piecritic
@piecritic I understand the reasoning but I think it's a mistake. It *can't* cross from "experiment" unless users can see it's viable.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@piecritic And that means ability to produce binaries which perform competitively with x86 ones.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker it will also help once there’s actually hardware boards that people can play with. Makes it “real”.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @piecritic
@piecritic Are there any FPGA boards you can get a practical system with right now? (practical = fast, necessary add'l devices etc.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @piecritic
@piecritic That's really sad but typical of academia... :-(1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@piecritic This is why I'm excited to be working on stuff for J-Core project - we actually have something usable. http://0pf.org/j-core.html1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@piecritic J4 with MMU is still a ways off but it's going to be fun.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.