This. I was disappointed with @FallenPegasus for doing that because of possibility for bias/conflict-of-interest.https://twitter.com/hanno/status/698885474736332800 …
@kevinbowling1 @hanno No it's a sad place when men think the best use of their time is writing treatises on why a pro-women study was flawed
-
-
@kevinbowling1@hanno And they know said treatises will be misused to attack the need for change rather than as call for new better studies.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@RichFelker@hanno I don't know anything about the author or article but see many arguing chilling effect.Up to people w/interest to restudy -
@kevinbowling1@hanno That's not what "chilling effects" means. -
@RichFelker@hanno Hanno writes about various things wrong in science and presumable would write about this study but now a bunch of folks\ -
@RichFelker@hanno say that due to specifics of the topic it would be wrong (like you) or dangerous (like others). -
@ch3root I kinda understand the arguments by@RichFelker and others, although I also find it difficult -
@ch3root@RichFelker I tended to settle for "there are gazillion studies where I can explain these problems, it doesn't have to be this one"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.