@staatsgeheim @canadianbryan They broke valid correct programs for a false sense of fixing hopelessly broken ones.
-
-
@canadianbryan@staatsgeheim Instead you develop tools to screen/catch wrong usage, & don't let incompetent ppl write code needing csprng. -
@canadianbryan@staatsgeheim 'Cos even if you give them a csprng, if they don't understand why they need it, they'll botch the calling code.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RichFelker@staatsgeheim From the commit: "Violates POSIX and C89, which violate best practice in this century." -
@canadianbryan@staatsgeheim The only "best practice" violated by rand() spec is the unfortunate naming. But you have to RTFM to write C. -
@canadianbryan@staatsgeheim rand() is a deterministic&reproducible prng. That's what it's specified to be. Deal with it or complain to WG14
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.