This is not what "C users" want. It's what stubborn old timers unwilling to fix/replace their buggy code want. https://twitter.com/hashbreaker/status/668711545157853184 …
@CopperheadSec @dotstdy Like maybe attribute((wrapv)) etc.? (On the type/decl.)
-
-
@RichFelker@dotstdy As in a way to opt-in to unspecific/inconsistent results for shifts, uninit reads, etc. rather than full on UB. -
@RichFelker@dotstdy They do already have function scope level control over the sanitizers though, FWIW.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.