@filler @AlTobey Here's a thread on the (bogus) legal theory they invented as excuse for removing GPLv2 versions: https://lwn.net/Articles/475942/ …
-
-
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker@filler@AlTobey What is bogus in this thread?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker@filler@AlTobey Ok, FSF doesn't violate GPL (after they get (c) for the generated files). And they don't say so AFAICT.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ch3root
@RichFelker@filler@AlTobey Tarballs are just non-redistributable. And you say that they should continue provide them?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@RichFelker@filler@AlTobey Generated files under GPL without sources? Non-redistributable. Because it's not source code.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@ch3root@filler@AlTobey Restrictions on what qualifies as "preferred form for modification" only can restrict derivative works.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker
@ch3root@filler@AlTobey Purpose of this clause is to preclude distributing your changes in non-source form & just calling it "source".1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.