@RichFelker @oshepherd @whitequark @eevee and neither UTC nor UT1 is a good basis for computer time, but that's even harder to admit.
This. Sadly I don't think it's politically easy for the committee to admit this.https://twitter.com/oshepherd/status/660807589480001536 …
-
-
-
@laurentbercot@oshepherd@whitequark@eevee UT1 is a perfectly good basis for anything related to coordinating w/ humans or other computers -
@laurentbercot@oshepherd@whitequark@eevee TAI otoh is only good for one thing: physics. And UTC is good for nothing at all. -
@RichFelker@laurentbercot@whitequark@eevee TAI is perfectly good. Actual UTC is fine*. POSIX "UTC" is nonsense -
@RichFelker@laurentbercot@whitequark@eevee (*A correctly defined time_t for UTF would actually be TAI) -
@oshepherd@laurentbercot@whitequark@eevee We're not going to agree on this so let's agree to disagree. -
@RichFelker@laurentbercot@whitequark@eevee The important thing is that the clock is continuous and monotonic. This is why POSIX UTC fails -
@oshepherd@laurentbercot@whitequark@eevee There are other important things too, like ability to interpret times without ext. data. - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.