Ah, GCC has docs here on fixing programs with broken use of inline that stopped working due to gcc5: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html …
@laurentbercot Dropping support for all extensions by default would be a major regression for nearly all real-world usage.
-
-
@laurentbercot See how hard it was to use musl before we had default-features, i.e. this commit: http://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit?id=c1a9658bd19245ff0fb52d3da567815d822fb622 … -
@RichFelker Oh, definitely. And I accuse GNU of *encouraging*, if not creating, the use of nonstandard extensions without f. t. macros. -
@laurentbercot Every historical unix did it, and this practice predates existence of standards. Half the purpose of FTMs is to suppress it. -
@RichFelker GNU more than any other Unix is guilty of https://xkcd.com/927/ . And FTMs would be a good thing if they worked... -
@RichFelker As is, FTMs are unreliable and I have to use tests to check for functionality. To their credit, GNU respects FTMs very well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.