Irony: the html version of the original UTF-8 paper fails to properly specify that it's in UTF-8. http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/utf.html …
-
-
@RichFelker Ah, the infamous confusion between XHTML 1 and HTML 4.01. Don't blame the paper authors for it... blame the W3C :-) -
@laurentbercot I know it's not their fault, but somebody should seriously get this fixed. It's embarrassing. -
@RichFelker If anything, it's embarrassing for@mozillafirefox.@googlechrome has no problems with it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@RichFelker My browser renders it, therefore it's valid. All else is pedanticism. -
@landley@richfelker "my compiler compiles it, therefore it's valid C"
New conversation -
-
-
@richfelker It would be if it were XHTML.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.