Linux on the desktop will never be a reality purely because of systemd-resolved and captive portals
Oh yes I know the awful reasons the providers do it. I don't understand why ppl use their networks when 4G/LTE/whatever is faster and less invasive.
-
-
My phone has like 3 wifi APs saved for the few no-captive-portal cafes with gigabit fiber, and home ones. Otherwise I just use cellular data.
-
Ah, I am nearly WiFi-only. My plan only has 3gb data, so using LTE when I'm out is expensive (and I'm on T-Mo which is frankly nearly the cheapest of them)
-
Cricket has unlimited data for $35/mo.
-
It's throttled after 2GB (or larger threshold if you pay for more), but even with the throttling it's faster than most bad cafe wifi.
-
I think cricket is a tmo mvno so that's probably the same thing I get (though mine is $40/3gb instead)
-
I've never run out, so I don't know what "slower" means. I thought it went to 2g, so I make sure never to overrun. TMO HSPA/+ is pretty solid ime
-
It's not "going to 2G", just throttling at speeds that are supposedly 2G but many times faster than what anyone ever got on actual 2G. Still carried over 3G/4G/LTE channels.
-
Ah, ok. Thx for explanation. I joined smartphoneworld after LTE was live, so the "oldest" I have exp with is 3g (which is faster than my home internet sometimes)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In Canada, data is incredibly expensive ($50/month for 2GB). Going wifi-only is a much more cost-effective option.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.