This is an important post and something I fully identify with and was way out of bounds by @VICE and @sarahjeong. As @RealSexyCyborg notes, any China based journalist gets the very real potential danger anyone in China faces speaking on anything publicly. Couple of notes 1/nhttps://twitter.com/RealSexyCyborg/status/1026468486128648193 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @BaldingsWorld @VICE and
Can you actually explain how VICE put Wu's safety in jeopardy? If her safety was actually in jeopardy, she wouldn't be trying to use the Sarah Jeong controversy to signalboost her issue. There's a lot of inaccurate things about Wu's account of the story.
8 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @voksul @BaldingsWorld and
VICE printed unfounded accusations about Wu’s personal life, which led to Chinese authorities forcing her to go offline temporarily. What are the inaccurate things about Wu’s account?
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @ScienceGuyTony @voksul and
She also strongly suggests that there are other aspects to the story that she still can't talk about.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @marshray @ScienceGuyTony and
And as such everyone asking should stop asking about it and accept that she's entitled to make decisions about her own safety and that journalists have an obligation to honor their own written agreements to do the same.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @RichFelker @marshray and
They did. They literally did. That's my entire point. No one reads the article, Wu started this entire feud and doxxed a VICE employee before the article was even published. VICE responded her to talk about safety, the article has been published and the things she said VICE
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Oh I thought you were asking a serious question not being a disingenuous asshat. Blocked.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.