Please don’t retweet articles making technical claims about the integrity of civic society that don’t cite multiple reputable experts.
-
Show this thread
-
If I’ve learned anything about election security, it’s really easy to think you have any idea about election security. There are so many weird procedural layers. I won’t even talk about it. Same thing with industrial control systems. It’s a whole other universe of expertise.
12 replies 23 retweets 154 likesShow this thread -
If your solution is simple you probably don’t understand the problem.
18 replies 56 retweets 199 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @SwiftOnSecurity
Everything about election security is bafflingly unintuitive.
4 replies 9 retweets 71 likes -
Replying to @pwnallthethings @SwiftOnSecurity
There is still 100% no reason for the machines to be on any network.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @bpphantom @SwiftOnSecurity
Disagree. If malware on a voting machine can undetectably change a vote, it's already broken beyond repair, and if it can't, then it doesn't matter much whether it's on a network.
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Knowledge of cyber security doesn't transfer well to election security because you need to do more than make it hard for hackers to break in: you need to prove the robustness of the system *despite* hackers breaking in. Which is one of many reasons why it's so unintuitive.
4 replies 2 retweets 17 likes
I don't find any of this unintuitive, just *hard*.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.