I work chiefly in two areas of tech policy: voting, where new hard problems keep coming up, and surveillance, where we mostly just have the same stupid argument over and over.https://twitter.com/techdirt/status/1022159595735863297 …
-
-
That’s a sensible policy argument. But we don’t need to have that argument (and people can disagree about it) if it’s not technically possible to build a system that actually behaves that way.
-
I don't see it as a policy argument. It's a logical inconsistency of requirements argument, which is "harder" than just technical.
-
Balancing competing equities like that is exactly the kind of thing congress deals with in all sorts of domains all the time.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don’t disagree. Just providing my interpretation of prior tweets.

-
Yes, just pointing out how there are some messed-up definitions (or disingenuous hand-waving away the need for definitions) being flung around in this domain.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.