sure, there's production code that will be broken subtly or horribly by basically any transformation, because it works only by accident. or are you talking about non-erroneous codes?
-
-
They operate on machine code, don't have any metadata about function boundaries etc. So I doubt they could even make the pc range check work at all.
-
Too much information was already thrown away.
-
well, good luck with that musl code then!
-
FWIW glibc has to do something comparable to get it right but I don't know if they've merged it yet.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.