Our national policy is deliberate cruelty to refugees. There's a part of me that believes, or wants desperately to believe, that if enough of us will just understand this, it will stop. But part of me fears this is exactly what many of us want.
That's why I said cutting off their lines of influence over the future rather than cruelty against them.
-
-
I'd even fucking gladly pay exorbitant taxes to keep them home, out of public sphere, and content until they die off.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"reconciliation/reconstruction at a fundamental, constitutional level whereby the people who made it happen and urged it on are not treated with cruelty, but unable to vote, hold government or private management positions, etc." sounds pretty cruel and fascistic to me
-
I'm all for implementing this at the social level - "punching nazis," so to speak; denying them a platform, firing them, etc. But I don't think the authoritarian government should have any role in that sort of thing.
-
It's hard because we (1) don't have a really legitimate government, and (2) don't have any laws to address the scope of this distributed agency in atrocities.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.