Voit lisätä twiitteihisi sijainnin, esimerkiksi kaupungin tai tarkemman paikan, verkosta ja kolmannen osapuolen sovellusten kautta. Halutessasi voit poistaa twiittisi sijaintihistorian myöhemmin. Lue lisää
1/ Beginning to create a board game that models reality and is designed to help us positively shape it. Quick description below 
2/ The GOAL of the game is neither competitive (most games) nor cooperative (Hanabi, Pandemic, etc.). Instead, the goal is from 2 POVs: self and world. Get points for: - Max happiness/meaning for self - Max integral for humans and animalspic.twitter.com/iPcxaWVzPk
3/ The game is structured as a Risk-style or AoE-style turn-based strategy. It is broken into 8 decade-long turns. 02020, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 02100.
You play on this @OurWorldInData map.pic.twitter.com/RwJoLV3eRn
4/ In addition to tracking the map (with Lvl 1-5 across countries from 1-1-1-4 to 1-1-4-5), also track: - Institutional Co-evolution (by info/capital leverage) - Current scarcity/abundance constraints (from capital/trust to attention) - State of trust (central to distributed)pic.twitter.com/ErbQZjYNhn
5/ Each player plays as multiple "characters". 1. Self 2. nB people in one of Rosling's 5 levels https://www.rhyslindmark.com/expanding-hans-roslings-factfulness-why-we-should-use-5-levels-instead-of-4/ … 3. "What is Emerging": The co-evolving Earth (Nature 1.0), Human Organism (N 2.0), Machines (N 3.0). (Play this one together.)
(Not sure if this is correct. Difficult to determine what the "agents" should be. Perhaps you should play as institutions in and of themselves?)
6/ On each turn (decade): - "Event" cards occur (facist leaders elected, meta x-risk exponentials progress e.g. CO2 increases, etc.). - Humans die, are born, and level up. - Animals die (700B land animals/decade). - Players take actions from n character POV (self-tax!)
7/ At end of game, count up your score as: - Individual happiness/meaning - Integral of happiness for humans/animals (taking into account future humans given fragility modifier with how well you've solved meta x-risk).
8/ Hopefully this game will help us: - Map reality better (by co-designing the game itself and surfacing most important concepts of "our system") - "Play" reality better (by really understanding our world of complex interconnected systems through play)
9/ Thoughts/feedback? Would you be interested in playing this co-evolutionary/coopetive game? Backing in on Kickstarter? Helping me co-design it? Create a board game version and a digital version? Would this game actually help us in, ya know, IRL?
Thank you @maro254 for writing “Making Magic” to help me understand how games are made. e.g.
https://magic.wizards.com/en/articles/archive/making-magic/ten-things-every-game-needs-part-1-part-2-2011-12-19 …
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.
