Tom Lane Quote of the day
>FWIW, my recommendation for this sort of thing is almost always to not use CHAR(n). The use-case for that datatype pretty much disappeared with the last IBM Model 029 card punch.
TIL @PostgreSQL no longer supports the IBM Model 029
Replying to @Eulerizeit @PostgreSQL
I usually put it as "char(n) is strictly for COBOL programmers". See also https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Don%27t_Do_This#Don.27t_use_char.28n.29 …
8:24 AM - 30 Apr 2019
0 replies
3 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.