Circumcision is male genital mutilation Circumcision is male genital mutilation Circumcision is male genital mutilation Circumcision is male genital mutilation Circumcision is male genital mutilation Circumcision is male genital mutilation
Like what? most circumcision world wide is done for religious reasons, most of the rest are done as RIC, If there's a valid medical reason and only such surgery can treat it, like every other surgery, or the person themselves wants it, then and only then should it be allowed.
-
-
Phimosis
-
I figured this would be the one. Often it's misdiagnosed when dealing with children and infants, since the foreskin is meant to be tight and fused at birth to the glans, only 1% of men still have an issue at the age of 17. Of those about 80% can be fixed non surgically, then >>
-
2> there is a less invasive surgical option. for the tiny percent of men who these other options don't fix, and we're talking men here because phimosis is an adult condition, they consent to surgery. But all the 1 billion plus men in the world weren't cut for phimosis were they?
-
No. I was merely stating that not all cases are needless. It’s a broad statement to make. I wasn’t offering an opinion that contradicts yours. Wasn’t offering an opinion at all. Just a fact. You’re entitled to your opinion. Have a good one.
-
And no one is calling for a ban on any surgery that is medically required, or consented to by the one getting it done, just like labiaplasty technically falls under the definitions of FGM, but when an adult woman wants it, she can have it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.