11th - "So I researched it. I sought out comments by adult men who had had a circumcision later in life, and more importantly, by choice." How many of these men were making reports shortly after? Before any long term issues set in? More to the point, what is the effect of >>
-
-
5> diminished and the organ be in as quiet a state as possible." and "None of the activities necessary for the preservation of the individual is harmed thereby, nor is procreation rendered impossible, but violent concupiscence and lust that goes beyond what is needed are >>
-
6> diminished. The fact that circumcision weakens the faculty of sexual excitement and sometimes perhaps diminishes the pleasure is indubitable. For if at birth this member has been made to bleed and has had its covering taken away from it, it must indubitably be weakened." >>
-
7> Both revered Jewish scholars for their time. Or of the medical men from a century ago - "For this purpose, if the prepuce is long, we may circumcise the male patient with present and probably with future advantages; the operation, too, should not be performed under >>
-
8> chloroform, so that the pain experienced may be associated with the habit we wish to eradicate." Athol A. W. Johnson. The Lancet, vol. 1 (1860) and "The only physiological advantage which the prepuce can be supposed to confer is that of maintaining the penis in a condition >>
-
9> susceptible to more acute sensation than would otherwise exist. It may increase the pleasure of intercourse and the impulse to it: but these are advantages which in the present state of society can well be spared." Editor, Medical World, (1900)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.