Third "While there is at least debate about the benefits, or otherwise, of male circumcision, that is emphatically not the case when it comes to the cruel practice of FGM" There actually is such a debate, it's simply heavily stacked the other way. >>
3> adult studies also only look a few years after, and many that say circumcision is an issue talk about ongoing damage, sensitivity loss over the years, rather than immediate. Many of these are also medical reason circumcisions, those who have phimosis (naturally rare, caused >>
-
-
4> often by poor care in childhood, like forced retraction of the foreskin in an intact penis, otherwise >1% of men) How much is that improvement going to last, if it does, and how much is the improvement because it wasn't normal, was bad before?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.