Now, if you don't understand why your one study does not hold up against a systematic review like the one that I provided, I can send you a link to the Coursera course on systematic review and meta-analysis.
-
-
5> That leads them to understate the complications of circumcision, as adult men are able to complain of their issues immediately and know the difference, infants circumcised grow up with their problems as normal and the causes ignored.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You talk a lot, but understand little. You need to understand how medical science works, before you can understand specific research results.
-
Honestly, I do understand more than you give me credit for, but I don't need to, this is unethical to start with. This is forcing surgery to remove a healthy body part. Why is the male foreskin the only part that is acceptable to remove for that reason?
-
Because it makes sex more pleasurable and the genophobic religions wouldn't want that, now would they?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.