Other studies disagree. Really a single counter example is needed, and there are many men who say it's less sensation. What makes more logically sense? Cutting off 10k-20k nerve endings, destroying the mucluos membrane and gliding function decreases sexual pleasure, or not?
-
-
Replying to @TibbitTidbits @dkingpower7 and
Oh, you mean the nerve ending myth that has no actual scientific study, and came from a bad magazine. the gliding function that many uncircumcised men don't even notice or doesn't do it for them, for sexual pleasure that studies shows no difference towards. I guess?
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @TibbitTidbits and
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17378847 CONCLUSIONS: The glans of the circumcised penis is less sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the uncircumcised penis. The transitional region from the external to the internal prepuce is the most sensitive region of the uncircumcised penis and >>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
2> more sensitive than the most sensitive region of the circumcised penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive parts of the penis. Sorrels et al, 2007
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @TibbitTidbits and
>Another furry intactivist Every damn time. Anyway, that study was already critique with its methodological flaws and having their 1st table being incomplete, while still drawing to conclusion: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06970_6.x …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @TibbitTidbits and
Citing Morris won't do much, his biases are quite well known. Not to mention he does not actually refute the findings, agreeing that Meissner’s corpuscles are light touch receptors and their existence on the foreskin would cause these measurements. He does claim that this >>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @TibbitTidbits and
>"Morris is biased" >"Uses a study from Van Howes, the open anti-circumcision." Full circle.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aimlesslytrying @TibbitTidbits and
Then who isn't biased here? Are there any researchers that aren't? I doubt it, particularly I would wager those that are neutral but see damaged and costs would come out against it. Any who are neutral and see good evidence of benefit would probably come out for it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
I haven't seen any evidence of real benefits, particularly not any that justify infant circumcision. I've seen the African studies and could see the issues with it myself, which fall inline with many of the critiques of those studies, even if true, this does not justify infant >>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
2> circumcision, as there will be no possible benefits until the boy is sexually active, and is not using condoms. I've also seen all the studies that show no HIV protection from circumcision, like the one done by the US Military in 2004. I have heard the claims about penile >>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
3> cancer, but again not something that makes infant circumcision justified, as it's another condition that only matters in adults. The third claim is UTIs, which data suggests is a higher problem in the USA than in other countries, likely due to bad foreskin care instructions >>
-
-
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
4> but even then, it's known that UTIs are more common in girls than in boys, they get antibiotics, boys get surgery, which I believe always will cause sexual issues when they get older, mostly from personal experience which brought me to intactivism in the fist place.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ReyosB @aimlesslytrying and
As for that personal experience, it's not just myself but my sexual partners, intact and not, used as datapoints, a small sample size, but one that shows a very clear, universally true between the two test groups, difference in sexual function and sensitivity.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.