Studies have shown time and time again that sensation between a circumcised man and uncircumcised are non existence. Even with ones that had sex before their circumcision shows no difference, which kinda detroyes that foreskin gives out a much greater sensation.
-
-
3> cancer, but again not something that makes infant circumcision justified, as it's another condition that only matters in adults. The third claim is UTIs, which data suggests is a higher problem in the USA than in other countries, likely due to bad foreskin care instructions >>
-
4> but even then, it's known that UTIs are more common in girls than in boys, they get antibiotics, boys get surgery, which I believe always will cause sexual issues when they get older, mostly from personal experience which brought me to intactivism in the fist place.
-
As for that personal experience, it's not just myself but my sexual partners, intact and not, used as datapoints, a small sample size, but one that shows a very clear, universally true between the two test groups, difference in sexual function and sensitivity.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.