How ANYONE, let alone a WOMEN, could promote & carry out this barbaric practice is utterly beyond me. How can you take the ability to orgasm away from a woman, so they don't "wander" Could it be the males in these societies are such totally useless "lovers?"
-
-
You may not need a lecture from me on women, but perhaps you could use one on men, on the penis and the foreskin, since being a gay guy I've had a lot more experience there than you have? The difference between someone circumcised at birth and someone left intact is staggering.
-
Well Reyos I must say that EVERY ONE of the ladies I have had the pleasure of knowing biblicaly have preferred the fireman's helmet over the anteater. It has had absolutely no ill affect on me whatsoever. Anyway we WERE on the subject of FGM, not on dicks
-
How many of them have actually had experience with an intact man? It's a taught preference, not an experiential one. There have been studies of those women who have been with both circumcised and intact men, 85% prefer the intact man, and say they are 1.75 times more likely >>
-
2> to reach orgasm with an intact man (O'Hara & O'Hara, 1999) and have much less discomfort and pain with an intact partner. And by the way we're on the topic of genital mutilation, and in this case the false differences brought into play based on gender.>>
-
3> I bet most men in the cultures that preform say infibulation would vastly prefer women who have had their external genitals cut off then sewn up too, but does their preference in a partner make it right? Oh and most gay men, with any experience also prefer intact partners.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
