FGM is against English law, but still there has been no successful prosecution! Are the authorities scared of being called “racist" if they interfere with these unspeakably barbaric “cultural practices”? https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/fgm-uk-female-genital-mutilation-countries-girls-children-cutters-flight-survivor-police-a8560306.html …
-
-
If you want to debate anatomy & physiology with me mate, you had better do more research.
-
I have, quite a bit, most people believe the clitoris is just what's exposed but the clitoris as a whole looks like this (picture of 3d printed model) Nor again does all FGM include any partial clitoral removal, the cases from Australia and Michigan lately were about FGM 1a and 4pic.twitter.com/x7ps7hsnTF
-
1A is removal of the clitoral hood only, and the subtype of 4 involved (it's a catch all type for "anything else done to female genitals") were a small nick to the clitoral hood no tissue removal. These are just as illegal as infibulation would be (4% of all FGM worldwide)
-
As for circumcision, part of the issue is those who defend it not seeing the foreskin as a part of, an integral and important part of, the penis as a whole, not only due to containing the frenulum and ridged band, the most densely enervated parts of the body, but also for its >>
-
2> function, providing for the mechanical gliding in proper intercourse. The outer skin is meant to stay stationary once the penis is inside, the penis is meant to move inside its own skin, when that skin is removed, the outer skin moves too, causing painful friction.
-
Glad you did so much research on the subject, the question remains: Why alter a perfectly functioning piece of anatomy? Besides, when I need a lecture on fucking & women from a gay guy, I'll eat a bullet.
-
That's a good question! Why alter a perfectly functioning piece of anatomy? The answer is there is no good reason, and that answer applies both to FGM and to circumcision just as equally. There is no good reason to cut into any child's genitals.
-
You may not need a lecture from me on women, but perhaps you could use one on men, on the penis and the foreskin, since being a gay guy I've had a lot more experience there than you have? The difference between someone circumcised at birth and someone left intact is staggering.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.