RT @Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court rules extracted human genetic material cannot be patented, but synthetic material can http://reut.rs/196lyi6
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters On patenting human genetic material, ruling shows common sense prevails. Now for the iPhone/Samsung "turned on its head ruling"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT
@Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court rules extracted human genetic material cannot be patented, but synthetic material can http://reut.rs/196lyi6Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters@Dutch_Mandel Not good. Same reason we have synthetic hormones which are bad for us and can't get natural ones from MDs@kksheldThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Good to see some unanimous rulings this am. RT
@Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court rules extracted human genetic material cannot be patented.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
RT-
@Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court rules extracted human genetic material cannot be patented, but synthetic material can http://reut.rs/196lyi6Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“
@Reuters: U.S. Supreme Court rules extracted human genetic material cannot be patented, but synthetic material can http://reut.rs/196lyi6 ”Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters WTF should I expect otherwise?!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@reuters this is a good thingThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.