.@Reuters 2nd US Circuit Court Of Appeals "definition of "marriage" in federal law as between one man & one woman" violates equal protection
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters not suprised with "human rights" more suprises are on the way.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters Wonder what the Founding Fathers would say about that!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters Now we have to pay for HIV testing of homosexual partners who claim stuff on their insurance under dependents, etc., etc., sicknessThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters I think it's a perfect definition...except you're a devils advocate,,,,mctheeeeewThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters YES!! One step forward human rights & equal opportunityThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters so between two men and three women is OK?#WorldIsGoneCrazyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@Reuters That's the trouble when "laws" are invented. "equal protection" is not even remotely related to "definition of marriage".Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.