-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not when he’s been nominated by an unindicted co-conspirator to a federal crime he should not. Especially when he could potentially make a ruling on said individual. You really think we’re that stupid Tim? When is your next town hall?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It seems like I was hearing something different from Republicans when it was a Democrat in the Oval Office. Why the change?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If he's so respected, then release the rest of the hidden documents democrats are requesting. You represent me, not your own interests. You vote for him, I vote you out this November.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Uh, couldn’t disagree with you more. But I can’t wait to see your reply to Kevin’s question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, OK.... The same can be said about Garland. Kavanaugh qualification has nothing to do with this. There is a very good possibility this President is a criminal, in no way should he name another Justice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You should be concerned about your own viability as our representative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, exact same courtesy that Garland got. Oh wait . . .
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sure, but after the election. Why the hurry?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
At this point, the problem is Trump as much as Kavanaugh.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Kavanaugh called Rehnquist “my first judicial hero." Rehnquist gave literacy tests to black & Hispanic voters in Arizona in 1960s, supported all-white primaries in Texas, opposed Brown v Board of Education & said Plessy v. Ferguson ("separate but equal") was constitutional
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wrong. Delay is an ethical duty in this instance.https://twitter.com/ianbassin/status/1012416296405827585 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Absolutely not.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are wrong, sir.
#FlipMI07Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No...they should wait and see what is going to happen with the POTUS. We wouldn’t want to stain the Supreme Court with an impeachable President.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And this is exactly why you will be voted out of office in 2018.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And lastly Sir, your silence makes you and the GOP as a whole complicit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not appropriate givin the Mueller investigation, Trumps association with Election Payoffs, and reported coordination with the Russian break-in of the DNC. Under what logic to you believe a potentially criminal and/or illegitimate president should name another judge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
HORSE SHIT!!!!! Remember how you wanted the VOTERS to decide our next SCOTUS when Obama nominated GARLAND? You traitorous bastards stole his nominee! YOU KNOW HAVE A presdent who is an unindicted co-conspirator in a felony crime and his election. NO NO NO we wait until after.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.