Because Republicans have been gaslighting Americans so these hearings are to remind the public of what impeachment is for. 
If impeachment is so clear, then why does the Judiciary Committee have professors testifying instead of firsthand, fact witnesses? Expert witnesses and hearsay are no substitution for facts! #MS01
-
-
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
That bubble must be cozy
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
You know why. Because the firsthand witnesses testified before the Intelligence Committee OR are being blocked from testifying by the White House.
#CountryBeforePartyMerci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
The president should testify then
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Fact: the POTUS admitted to asking Ukraine to investigate the Biden’s and then suggested China do as well. I’m a witness because I saw him do this on TV. Want me to testify?https://youtu.be/NHKWusypmpc
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
Because the White House declined the invitation and additionally ordered witnesses to disobey subpoenas. I’d love to hear Rudy testify. Wouldn’t you?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
With due respect, Congressman, the White House has refused to let first-hand witnesses testify and refuses to release the relevant documents. The president’s obstruction prevents the American people from hearing from first-hand witnesses. You know this. Do better, sir.
-
Furthermore, you—like me—are a veteran. You swore an oath—not to a party, not to person, but to *Constitution of the United States* Trump is trampling our Constitution, shredding checks & balances, and weakening our national security. You swore an oath, sir. Remember your oath.
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
The case for impeachment is clear. The understanding of what impeachment is is not. The intelligence committee gathered evidence using fact witnesses and otherwise , and the judiciary committee is determining if it meets the level of impeachment.https://www.businessinsider.com/most-americans-dont-understand-impeachment-poll-2019-6 …
-
Impeachment inquiry is like questioning witnesses in an investigation. The impeachment itself is a formal charge of wrongdoing. That’s why they list offenses out in articles. The trial itself happens in the Senate. That’s when the defense starts to have rights...
- Voir les réponses
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.