Tom, That is such a vanilla statement it says nothing. When it comes to financial disclosure of the people that we asked to speak on our behalf there is only one answer: Honest, timely and complete disclosure by all who seek office. This "both sides" thing is a losing tactic.
During yesterday's @WaysMeansCmte hearing regarding the tax returns of future candidates for Pres. & VP, I queried the experts on what constitutes conflicts of interest and our duty as members of the legislative branch to oversee the executive branch.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4778700/legislative-proposals-related-presidents-vice-presidents-tax-returns&fbclid=IwAR2cBSsGt6rUFmO3IdBIwO8r44iC8dNbkr5wVeIek_Y7hK7btjObWtaH0AU …
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thank you
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dr. Thorndike, conflicts of interest obviously occurred that weren't acknowledged, it's disgraceful you admit so timidly. Bookbinder, it points out the importance of making rules to prevent this is in the future because we have none. RepSuozzi, thanks for the great questioning!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.