You just made a very powerful point. If this were a "regular" jury trial, Sen. Graham would have a hard time getting on that jury because he is clearly already biased. GOP senators keep showing that, & any verdict they come up with that exonerates Trump will be tainted.
Have you ever heard of a jury declaring a defendant innocent before all the evidence is even collected? Neither have we.
@SenateGOP, let’s stick to our Constitutional duty to follow the facts.https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/466193-gop-senators-worry-planned-graham-letter-to-pelosi-could-raise-questions …
-
New conversation
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
He has no business chairing the senate judicial committee. None.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“I will sign the letter, but that doesn’t mean I think it’s necessarily a good idea,” Kennedy said.
#CowardGOP -
Right? If you can't get behind it, don't sign.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
HOW can I trust the impartiality of the impeachment jury in the Senate when the majority passes a resolution to condemn the House before the facts have been presented to them? This jury is now tainted In a court trial these jurors would be replaced by alternate jurorspic.twitter.com/HkqCR14BKA
-
Just wondering since impeachment has so rarely ever happened...do any senators have to recuse themselves if there is a conflict of interest, or any type of issues that would impact their impartiality?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.