Isn't failing to properly warn and prepare a US embassy or consulate for an imminent attack the crux of the republicans' alleged issue with Secretary Clinton's handling of Benghazi?
We’re back in the @realDonaldTrump upside down. Lawmakers are debating how irresponsible it was that none of the “four embassies” were put on high alert for an “imminent threat.” That’s the debate Trump prefers as it looks like he made most of this up. #TrumpedUpWar
-
-
-
The protests and fires at the US embassy in Iran in the days prior to the Soleimani assassination even mirror the protests around Benghazi prior to the attack there. If it’s true that 4 embassies weren’t notified of an imminent attack, we need 11 hours of Pompeo testimony, stat!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Yes they do! I have one in my family and know exactly how much damage they can cause. Most “normal” people have never dealt with this type of personality and have no idea how manipulative they can be. It’s terrifying to me to know we have one in the White House!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
Debating whether the embassies received notice is another example of sophisticated GOP disinformation - accepting the false premise that there was a threat against the embassies as being true, then directing inquiry elsewhere. Like the tag team they play spreading other falsehood
-
Maybe, but I dunno if you could call this ‘sophisticated GOP disinformation.’ Trump just makes stuff up—about everthing, all the time, even when he doesn’t have to — and his officials just have to scramble after him.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.