I think you will find that impeachment has only ever been pursued against presidents with two syllable names ending in "-on". There is no precendent for impeaching a man named "Trump".
Foiled. How did we forget about the “Presidential Right to First-Term Crime Spree” clause of the Constitution?https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1204026003619794944 …
0:18
"In modern history, we've never gone after impeaching a president in the first term" -- Kevin McCarthy argues that there's a precedent against impeaching presidents before their second term 
pic.twitter.com/lPJMJGlIQy
pic.twitter.com/lPJMJGlIQy-
-
-
Equally valid point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Jesus Christ, next it will be, he's from NY...we've never impeached a President from NY....or in his 70's. Age discrimination!!!!
-
Don’t give them any ideas.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@GOPLeader is frantic. Take a look at his last 48 hrs. Throwing anything and everything out there because he still has no defense of the withholding of aid and obstruction. Not a witness, no evidence, and not even an innocent president ready to step forward to exonerate himself. -
Nope, just pure defense of the indefensible. GOP =
#GeldingsOfPutin
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
The Trump regime is a criminal enterprise.pic.twitter.com/nsl7qCsbD8
-
International crime syndicate
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.