I don’t really have a problem with keeping a whistleblower anonymous, but if you do - their testimony CAN NOT be used as evidence to prosecute anyone for anything at any time The accused has the right to face their accuser in this country
In the future, you will go to jail if you out a whistleblower. Legislation coming.
-
-
-
If a whistleblower is going to be kept anonymous , their testimony can ONLY be used as a starting point for an investigation
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Eric, he’s not whistleblower; he’s plant. He worked 4
@BarackObama@JoeBiden@JohnBrennan His lawyer admitted in a tweet the COUP ON@realDonaldTrump started more than 2 years ago. U & your “buddy”@RepAdamSchiff R in big trouble. TREASON comes to mind. Welcome 2 the real World! - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Will those who defy Congressional subpoenas go to jail like the law says now? Or are y'all just gonna keep pretending this is okay?
-
Eric Holder first
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What you call ‘whistleblower’, I call Dem Operative trying to help the Left frame/oust a duly elected President.
-
So it’s ok to break the law
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Prison is going to be hard on you Eric Swalwell. Inserting your head up .
@repAdamSchiff's butt every day has to carry 10 years per incidence. You're now up to 12,000 years. -
It used to be a tight fit
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.