I don’t really have a problem with keeping a whistleblower anonymous, but if you do - their testimony CAN NOT be used as evidence to prosecute anyone for anything at any time The accused has the right to face their accuser in this country
-
-
-
If a whistleblower is going to be kept anonymous , their testimony can ONLY be used as a starting point for an investigation
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Eric, he’s not whistleblower; he’s plant. He worked 4
@BarackObama@JoeBiden@JohnBrennan His lawyer admitted in a tweet the COUP ON@realDonaldTrump started more than 2 years ago. U & your “buddy”@RepAdamSchiff R in big trouble. TREASON comes to mind. Welcome 2 the real World! - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Will those who defy Congressional subpoenas go to jail like the law says now? Or are y'all just gonna keep pretending this is okay?
-
Eric Holder first
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What you call ‘whistleblower’, I call Dem Operative trying to help the Left frame/oust a duly elected President.
-
So it’s ok to break the law

- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Prison is going to be hard on you Eric Swalwell. Inserting your head up .
@repAdamSchiff's butt every day has to carry 10 years per incidence. You're now up to 12,000 years. -
It used to be a tight fit
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.