You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
There is nothing in the statute to explicitly say that a whistleblower loses their Title V protections if they made a good faith attempt to comply with ICWPA and then comes to Congress directly.
What whistleblower would come forward if the DNI says their testimony would be unauthorized? This reasoning shifts the blame to the whistleblower when it should squarely be on the DNI/DOJ.
Ask for a writ of mandamus.
Yes!
I Would if the security of my country was in jeopardy. I would risk my own life for America just like my WWII Army Captain dad did. I would risk jail.
#RealityWinner tried that when she discovered Russian hackers had infiltrated the electoral process and was sentenced to 5 years as a result. No good deed goes unpunished under this administration with so many complicit enablers. Hope @RepSwalwell can look into her case as well.
Exactly.
Hopefully, the intel committee lawyers are researching & drafting an application for a writ of mandamus.
it’s Congress’ job to break the stonewall- to enforce subpeonas- to hold folks in contempt, to put violators behind bars!!
Can Dan Coats be the whistleblower?
In the UK, our whistleblowing law is similar ...it does not protect a whistleblower if they break the law in order to Blow the whistle. In an ideal World no one should have to blow the whistle #justculture ... I’m a high profile UK whistleblower who won her case. Still traumatic
What if they’ve already resigned their position?
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
