I want to push back on the assertion that there's a "right" or "liberty" to own an AR-15. No one is talking about banning all guns; people can still buy handguns, rifles, and shotguns. The Second Amendment doesn't prevent the govt. from saying civilians can't own weapons of war.
A war threat? Thank you for proving why we need to have licensing requirements, background checks, and red flag laws. Anyone who would “go to war” if a law was passed through democratic means SHOULD NOT own a gun. #EnoughIsEnoughhttps://twitter.com/ElijahSchaffer/status/1172527338275450881 …
-
-
-
Exactly! Well said!
#Beto2020 - 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Constitution > government. The bill of rights is a set of negative liberties against the government so that the people will remain free. The constitution was never meant to apply to the people, but to handcuff the government from assaulting its people.
-
Filing a lawsuit > insurrection.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
'Democratic means' - no. Amend the constitution, and then we'll talk. You are a turncoat. A traitor to your oath.
-
A militia was intended to supplement a regular military, not mow down people at Walmart or kill babies in kindergarten. War weapons are not needed.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just remember that pro-Russia propagandists are pushing for civil war in US.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.