Let me get this straight....A bad guy with a multi-felony history ignores all gun laws and shoots at cops when they try to serve a warrant, and you use this as reason why you think we need tougher laws on law abiding good guys to own guns?
-
-
-
The point is 100 (or how ever many)trained cops had guns and they barely held against ONE guy with a gun(s) (what ever type). How can school teachers be expected to defend our kids?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The shooter had 30 charges since 2007. It was already illegal for him to own a gun so can we cut the bullshit that new gun laws will make a criminal intent on murder suddenly decide it’s so super illegal to break that gun law that he won’t go murder people? It was an illegal gun.
-
My question is: why didn’t the cops just use nukes to take the guy out? Are those only reserved for law-abiding citizens who don’t want to give up their firearms?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
God is always with Capital letters
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Now do Vermont.
-
Is that Nukes McSwalwell? Does he know about the Philly Police MOVE bombing? Seriously,
#coincidence or more like#FreudianSlip ? - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
What law could you pass that would make a convicted felon with a long history of not obeying the law finally obey they law?
-
How about if he's caught with guns we confiscate them & he goes to jail? We shut down gun manufacturers & the supply dwindles. And then he can't buy more guns bcuz there aren't any to buy. Obviously this will take a while since there more guns than people in this country.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Wasn't that Walmart in El Paso full of good guys with guns too?
-
Ohio has a good guy with a gun standing right there as well.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.