Agree. Defend #1A. Truth is, we’ve been worried ever since:
1. Obama ACTUALLY put journalists under investigation (Not threatened on Twitter. Actually did it)
2. Dems have been urging limits to speech on social media platforms.
That said, I’d march with ya.https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1107670723194249223 …
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Let’s make it a federal crime when “journalists” (or senators) lie and INTERNATIONALLY omit information in order to further a campaign/agenda that INTENTIONALLY divides the populace. I’d love to meet an honest Democrat.
#AmericaFirst You in?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does it include verbal threats and inciting crowd violence against journos? Asking for sane America.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dan’s looking the other way.
#GutTheGOP -
Are journalists not already protected by laws against physics attack? Why as another law against the same thing but specifically for one amorphous group? See when I read "violence" I can't help but think of the "speech is violence" people.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What if the journalist was wearing a maga hat? Would your bill still protect them?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about passing a law that the “Press” can’t be excluded for “religious reasons?” Respectfully
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Hey guys, it’s already illegal to assault someone, regardless of occupation. Another law will do NOTHING to thwart a criminal from acting out.
#ShrinkGovernment - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.