You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
4/ I didn't see Nelson eat a brownie -- that would be direct evidence. But when I returned, he had crumbs on his shirt, and chocolate on his lips and fingers. That would be considered circumstantial evidence that Nelson ate a brownie.
5/ It's not direct, but that doesn't matter. The law says it's treated exactly the same way. So, @SenatorBurr, have you seen any circumstantial evidence of collusion? #RussiaInvestigation
Also, the type of information that serves as "evidence" in our system is stuff only professional investigators and intel officers can get. It will require travel records, phone records, video surveillance from intel partners etc. That is not something the the Senate can get.
Really? That surprises me. Are there other aspects a lay person might easily make incorrect assumptions? Briefly :)
Thank you. Blanket statements like Burr’s are disingenuous and crafted for sound bites. Most jurors can easily handle these concepts. And so too can the public. If they are not treated as though they are stupid and led by sound bites.
It’s more insidious than just a sound bite... He purposefully created a headline, so Trump could use it as evidence in his defense. No coincidence it happened right after news of Manfort’s transcripts broke. See point #5
pic.twitter.com/cmqfH79GrT
Very well written explanation, thank you! #HouseJudiciaryCommittee
HE ATE THE RUSSIAN BROWNIES.
And he's got chocolate all over his fingertips!pic.twitter.com/G1dsmKufvO
I think we all have.
Leave the gun take the cannoli
@SenatorBurr is part of the Vichy gov
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
