THREAD: Let's talk about direct vs circumstantial evidence. The law treats them the same. @SenatorBurr says there's no "direct evidence of collusion" b/w Trump & Russians. Put aside the fact that @MarkWarner doesn't agree w/ this. What matters is if there's evidence of collusion.
-
-
4/ I didn't see Nelson eat a brownie -- that would be direct evidence. But when I returned, he had crumbs on his shirt, and chocolate on his lips and fingers. That would be considered circumstantial evidence that Nelson ate a brownie.
Show this thread -
5/ It's not direct, but that doesn't matter. The law says it's treated exactly the same way. So,
@SenatorBurr, have you seen any circumstantial evidence of collusion?#RussiaInvestigationShow this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Dammit - now I want brownies

-
More importantly........ Freshly baked!
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Trump ate those brownies.. u can guarantee it.
-
And hamberders too
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Burr from NC? Sir, you're dealing with one of the greasiest of good ol' boy politicians. I wish you luck.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
In Trump world its altetnate situation you didnt turn around and you counted wrong.
-
Trump would say (with chocolate stuck in his teeth), I didn’t eat any brownies.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.