"If you don't turn over your guns, we'll nuke you" is definitely a reasonable argument to make.https://twitter.com/RepSwalwell/status/1063527635114852352 …
Joe, it’s sarcasm. He said he’s going to war with America if gun legislation was passed. I told him his government has nukes. God forbid we use sarcasm 
-
-
1) No no no... There's a difference between going to war with your government and going to war with your nation. If you believe the government IS the nation you've lost the point. There are so many problems with your statements...
-
3) If you believe a force consisting of the populace that has access to commonly owned civilian weapons can't defeat a large professional army, your grasp of history is...tenuous.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Joe, if more guns mean less crime, how many more guns does the US need before we’re safe?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
America is the people. Not the government. In case you forgot that. You are there to represent, not control
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I took an oath to defend the US Constitution. That oath is for life. The 2nd Amendment is a part of that. Maybe Eric should read both the oath taken by soldiers & LEO’s & the Constitution to understand where he stands.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Why is it only sarcasm when politicians make threats against the American people but it's a criminal offense when a citizen threatens a politician.
-
Why do so many politicians need security 24/7. That is paid for by the taxpayers. And why does Trump have his own additional private security detachment?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.